Determination of the Quality of Facilities, Lecturers and Curriculum on Student Satisfaction - Empirical Study in the International Business Management Program of Singkawang Institute of Science and International Business

Authors

  • Yohanes Gala Araftake Blikololong institut sains dan bisnis internasional singkawang
  • Kasnur Saputra institut sains dan bisnis internasional singkawang
  • sutarto sutarto institut sains dan bisnis internasional singkawang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37673/jebi.v10i1.6012

Keywords:

Facility Quality, Lecturer Competence, Curriculum Relevance, Student Satisfaction, Multiple Linear Regression, SPSS

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This study aims to examine the influence of facility quality, lecturer quality, and curriculum relevance on student satisfaction within the International Business Management (IBM) Study Program at the Institute of Science and International Business (ISBI) Singkawang. A quantitative associative approach was employed using a survey method. The population consisted of all active students in the IBM program, with a total sample of 25 respondents selected through purposive sampling, representing the entire population.

The research instrument used was a Likert-scale questionnaire, which had previously undergone validity and reliability testing. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression with IBM SPSS version 31. The classical assumption tests indicated that the data met the criteria for normality, linearity, absence of multicollinearity, and no heteroscedasticity.

The regression analysis revealed that the three independent variables—facility quality (X?), lecturer quality (X?), and curriculum relevance (X?)—collectively exert a significant influence on student satisfaction (Y), as evidenced by a significance level of 0.001 (< 0.05) and an F-value of 419.655 (> F-table value of 3.07). Individually, each independent variable also demonstrated a significant effect, with curriculum relevance (X?) emerging as the most dominant factor, shown by the highest regression coefficient (B = 0.839) and the largest t-value (11.857).

The coefficient of determination (R²) was found to be 0.984, indicating that 98.4% of the variance in student satisfaction can be explained by the three independent variables, while the remaining 1.6% is influenced by other factors outside the model. These findings highlight the critical role of enhancing curriculum relevance as a top priority in improving student satisfaction, while also emphasizing the importance of advancing both facility quality and lecturer competence within the IBM program at ISBI Singkawang.

Keywords: facility quality, lecturer competence, curriculum relevance, student satisfaction, multiple linear regression, SPSS

References

Mulyasa, E. 2013. Manajemen dan Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. 2017. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 24 Tahun 2017 tentang Standar Sarana dan Prasarana Sekolah. Retrieved from https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id

Harahap, D.A., Amanah, D., & [Penulis Ketiga]. 2021. Kualitas Dosen Sebagai Faktor Penentu Mahasiswa Memilih Universitas. Jurnal Ilmu dan Kreativitas Bisnis (JIKB). Retrieved from http://repository.stiemahardhika.ac.id/id/eprint/4211

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. 2020. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. Retrieved from http://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id

Mutaqin, A.Z. 2024. Relevansi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) dengan Era Society 5.0. HASBUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. Retrieved from https://journal.iaitasik.ac.id/index.php/hasbuna/article/view/310

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. 2020. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor?3 Tahun?2020 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. Retrieved from http://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id

Nuraida, I.D., Sobri, A.Y., & Sultoni, S. 2024. Pengaruh Sarana Prasarana dan Mutu Layanan Pendidikan terhadap Kepuasan Siswa Madrasah Tsanawiyah se-Kota Blitar. JAMP: Jurnal Administrasi dan Manajemen Pendidikan. Retrieved from https://journal-fip.um.ac.id/index.php/jamp/article/view/1451

Saputri, N., Nadiya, & Amelia. 2023. Pengaruh Kinerja Dosen, Kualitas Pelayanan Akademik, dan Fasilitas Belajar Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh. JEMSI: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi, Vol.?9(5), pp.?2268–2277. https://doi.org/10.35870/jemsi.v9i5.1582?

Santosa, S., Saputri, L.S. & Prijanto, T. 2023. Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan, Kurikulum dan Bursa Kerja Khusus Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan (Studi Kasus Peserta Didik Program 1 Tahun LKP Solocom Surakarta Tahun Akademik 2021–2022). Jurnal Ilmiah Edunomika, Vol.?7(1). https://doi.org/10.29040/jie.v7i1.8053?

Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Blikololong, Y. G. A., Saputra, K. ., & sutarto, sutarto . (2025). Determination of the Quality of Facilities, Lecturers and Curriculum on Student Satisfaction - Empirical Study in the International Business Management Program of Singkawang Institute of Science and International Business. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 10(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.37673/jebi.v10i1.6012